https://netmaker.org logo
Are we back up to a usable status again? I stopped...
# netmaker
m
Are we back up to a usable status again? I stopped using it a couple of versions back. I was having problems with certificate generation and authentication errors. I just jumped ship and setup my own static wireguard links.
j
people had issues upgrading due to the protocol switch between 16 and 17. We should have documented the upgrade steps better, but there no big changes for this one, just minor bugfixes and an added CLI tool.
m
Yeah, I think it was 16.2 or something.
or .4 ( if that was a release)
Part of my problem was Letsencrypt, some error would flood them for certificate generation and blackflag me.
j
oooooh yes, actually the switch to Caddy was meant to fix this
LetsEncrypt rate limits certificates, ZeroSSL does not, and Caddy should fall back to ZeroSSL
b
are you looking for someone to help with creating documentation?
j
Caddy still uses LetsEncrypt by default, and we have noticed in some cases it seems not to update, so for the next release we're going to make Caddy use ZeroSSL by default. If you run into issues, you can switch out the Caddyfile with the one in this branch: https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker/pull/1850
m
Hmm, okay. I just added the additional password flag to my docker-compose and updated it. Perhaps that was what happened. I think my previous version was using trafik
b
okay, i am usually able to figure things out. but if i could get a quick TLDR on what needs to be done for upgrades between versions I can help out making the upgrade docs
j
m
Remember, my last update and used version was 16.2 or 16.4
j
im trying to find the thread, but someone noticed a couple additional changes were necessary to continue using traefik
m
Okay, I even compared the main compose file on github at that time and it still had traefik. I actually used it and tried to switch to letsencrypt staging and was hit with errors.
Anyways, I'll take a look at it next year. It was definitely convenient. (until an update broke it)
3 Views