What is the preferred way to route a device withou...
# netmaker
b
What is the preferred way to route a device without the ability to install net client on? (Apple TV to remote server) I used to use a relay node in tailscale and I am attempting to figure out how to do this with netmaker
q
If you have a linux or freebsd machine on the same network, you can use an egress gateway with the CIDR set to just that machine specifically.(i.e 192.168.1.75/32 with local interface name - wlan0 or eth1, etc). Otherwise if you can use plain WireGuard, generate an ext client conf.
If you have vanilla WG on the machine and an Ingress gateway on your NM network, you can use an ext client conf. Otherwise, you would need a linux or freebsd machine on the same local network to act as an egress gateway (similar to that of exit node for Tailscale) and can point to that machine directly for maximum security on it's local interface. (ie 192.168.1.75/32 on eth1).
a
So I would need to enter that Linux machine as the default gateway
There’s no way to avoid that?
I’m wondering if I can install netmaker on my lan via a raspberry pi and then do a static route so that when devices on lan try to go to the mesh vpn addresses it forwards them over the rpi
q
that should work too
a
Because previously I had to set my Apple TV to use the rpi as a router but it has issues with the App Store when I do that
Is static route the preferred way to do that?
I’m trying to get the Apple TV to have access to a jellyfin instance
6 Views