I know I asked about this the other day but just to check To GRAVITL #netmaker

I know I asked about this the other day, but just ...

icy-school-84280

07/23/2022, 4:19 PM

I know I asked about this the other day, but just to check. To run Netmaker without Traefik as the reverse proxy, I can just comment it out from the compose file? I want to use Nginx (via SWAG). Or is it better to follow the production installation and then sub in Nginx that way? Also. The MQTT needs to be proxied too. Needs an Nginx stream that I can't see in the SWAG section.

jolly-london-20127

07/24/2022, 1:26 PM

Yes, kust remove traefik from docker compose, and then run nginx however you want

jolly-london-20127

07/24/2022, 1:26 PM

you dont actually have to proxy MQTT. DNS just needs to point to the machine, and in your docker compose you have to make sure the right port is specified

jolly-london-20127

07/24/2022, 1:27 PM

so if mosquitto exposes 8883 on the host, your mq address would be broker.yournetmaker.com:8883

jolly-london-20127

07/24/2022, 1:27 PM

and you'd need to set SERVER_HOST and MQ_PORT appropriately

green-waitress-79102

08/11/2022, 5:39 PM

Hey. Just quick follow up question. Sorry to bother. So in the above mentioned guidelines, it requires opening the port externally right (as in firewall)? (I get

could not connect to broker at broker.netmaker.xyz.abc:443

after 3 good pings otherwise. In the traffic compose file, there are the routes defined for 443 -> 8883. If I do not want to open the 8883 port, I am guessing I do need to write the proxy?

icy-school-84280

08/11/2022, 6:03 PM

I should also say, I didn't have a lot of success trying to run this behind Nginx instead of using the built in Traefik. But since I already use Nginx (via SWAG) and I can transfer it over to many systems (also I understand Nginx configuration files way better than Traefik) I will try again. Are there some worked examples of people using it with Nginx? Since it's very popular still over Traefik or Caddy

Previous Next