https://netmaker.org logo
b

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/933515130195562546/1104050396848205885/image.png

j
so netmaker would not be exposed publicly, and would be behind another VPN?
b
it would be exposed publicly at a static IP and port(s?) assigned by mullvad, a vpn provider
j
gotcha, so mullvad acting more as a proxy here?
b
yes!
j
it should work as long as you have the correct IP and ports exposed and forwarded properly
b
okay cool, I just thought of something though-- would I need to expose multiple ports on the same public IP? and how many ports would I need to expose for netmaker to serve clients? (i don't need them to access the web ui through this, if that matters)
i'm asking because i'm using those mullvad tunnels as my load-balanced gateways for my network, and if I had to have multiple ports on the same ip i'd have to sacrifice one or pay extra
j
yes, several
b
how many
j
there will actually be a few more than what is here. @echoing-controller-96073 is updating the docs today
TURN adds a few more
but you dont have to do TURN, so could just not deploy that part
Also depends on if you want to have the netclient on the server
if not, you dont have to expose 51821:51830/udp
Actually...I need @bored-solstice-58967 to comment. Are STUN and TURN both proxied through Caddy using 443, or do they need special ports?
If they're using 443, then you may just need that at minimum
b
TURN uses host network, and for STUN
3478
is exposed
b
so,.. just 443 and 51821?
j
so you would have to leave out STUN and TURN to do that
but then yes, you can even leave out 51821
that would just be for the netclient
and even then you dont have to expose the port publicly
so you can get away with just 443 on a minimum install
but caddy uses 80 (certbot) to request certificates, so may have to work around that
@bumpy-carpet-66909 if you're going to attempt this and are open to documenting it...join our technical writers program! We'll promote it and you'll get compensated: https://forms.gle/gs9PsyPajbMg9j1g9
3 Views